There is evidence out there that King Arthur was more than just a myth. However, that evidence often comes in the form of tiny scraps found in questionable sources. Those bits of evidence can be arranged and interpreted in a variety of different ways. As a result there are a plethora of plausible theories on the identity of the historical King Arthur. Which of these theories offers the best explanation for the legendary king’s true identity? Tune in and find out how the last of the Romans, savage tongues, and some dude named the Venerable Bede all play a role in the story. 

Works Cited

Armstrong, Dorsey. King Arthur: History and Legend. The Great Courses, 2015.

Ashe, Geoffrey. The Discovery of King Arthur. The History Press, 2013.

Carroll, D. F. Arturius: a Quest for Camelot. D.F. Carroll, 1996.

Coghlan, Ronan, et al. The Encyclopaedia of Arthurian Legends. Element, 1991.

Hannan, Martin. “Author Says Book Proves King Arthur Wasn’t from Scotland or a Royal.” The National, The National, 27 July 2018, www.thenational.scot/news/16380952.author-says-book-proves-king-arthur-wasnt-from-scotland-or-a-royal/.

Hannan, Martin. “Writer Claims £50k Prize for ‘Proving’ King Arthur’s True Identity.” The National, The National, 20 Aug. 2018, www.thenational.scot/news/16585589.writer-claims-50k-prize-for-proving-king-arthurs-true-identity/.

Morris, John. The Age of Arthur: a History of the British Isles from 350 to 650. Phillimore, 1977.

Russell, Miles. Arthur and the Kings of Britain: the Historical Truth behind the Myths. Amberley Publishing, 2018.

Russel, Miles. “The Real King Arthur: Why Are We so Obsessed with Trying to Solve the Mystery?” History Extra, 2 Apr. 2019, www.historyextra.com/period/early-medieval/king-arthur-real-who-why-solve-mystery/.